<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 822 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recalled the previous order and restored the stay application for further merits consideration after the appellant&#039;s non-prosecution due to not receiving the hearing notice. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the manufacturing process classification and duty liability, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal and staying the recovery process. The appellant&#039;s argument that their manufacturing process did not amount to duty payment during the disputed periods was upheld, leading to the restoration of the stay application and favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 822 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recalled the previous order and restored the stay application for further merits consideration after the appellant&#039;s non-prosecution due to not receiving the hearing notice. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the manufacturing process classification and duty liability, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal and staying the recovery process. The appellant&#039;s argument that their manufacturing process did not amount to duty payment during the disputed periods was upheld, leading to the restoration of the stay application and favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>