<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 815 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260890</link>
    <description>Preventive detention was held unsustainable where the authority failed to explain the delay between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention order, so the live link was treated as broken. The record showed only a seizure and verification of counterfeit currency months earlier, with no fresh material or meaningful development against the detenu after the chargesheet. Detention was also unjustified because the detenu was already in custody, his earlier bail pleas had been rejected, no fresh bail application was pending, and there was no objective material showing a real possibility of release on bail. The detention order and confirming order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 815 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260890</link>
      <description>Preventive detention was held unsustainable where the authority failed to explain the delay between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention order, so the live link was treated as broken. The record showed only a seizure and verification of counterfeit currency months earlier, with no fresh material or meaningful development against the detenu after the chargesheet. Detention was also unjustified because the detenu was already in custody, his earlier bail pleas had been rejected, no fresh bail application was pending, and there was no objective material showing a real possibility of release on bail. The detention order and confirming order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>