<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 814 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260889</link>
    <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal set aside SEBI&#039;s order prohibiting a stockbroker from new assignments for six months due to a violation of natural justice principles. SEBI relied on a statement without allowing the stockbroker to cross-examine the witness, prompting the Tribunal to quash the order and remand the matter for a fresh decision, directing SEBI to expedite the process within four months. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 814 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260889</link>
      <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal set aside SEBI&#039;s order prohibiting a stockbroker from new assignments for six months due to a violation of natural justice principles. SEBI relied on a statement without allowing the stockbroker to cross-examine the witness, prompting the Tribunal to quash the order and remand the matter for a fresh decision, directing SEBI to expedite the process within four months. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>