https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170896 Section 482 inherent powers cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision under Section 397(3) of the Code; once a party has pursued a revision before the Sessions Judge, the High Court cannot entertain another revision in that guise. An attachment under Section 146 also yields when the civil court has already taken effective seisin of the dispute through an interim injunction or receiver order, because the basis for maintaining the attachment no longer subsists. The Court accordingly upheld withdrawal of the attachment and rejected the attempt to use inherent jurisdiction to avoid the revision bar. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170896 Section 482 inherent powers cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision under Section 397(3) of the Code; once a party has pursued a revision before the Sessions Judge, the High Court cannot entertain another revision in that guise. An attachment under Section 146 also yields when the civil court has already taken effective seisin of the dispute through an interim injunction or receiver order, because the basis for maintaining the attachment no longer subsists. The Court accordingly upheld withdrawal of the attachment and rejected the attempt to use inherent jurisdiction to avoid the revision bar. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 07 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170896