<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Civil Court Can Address Director Appointment Disputes Due to Lack of Specific Remedy in Companies Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23501</link>
    <description>Appointment of directors - jurisdiction of the civil court - There is no remedy provided under the Companies Act for redressal of such a grievance before any particular court or forum or by recourse to any particular machinery. In these circumstances, the jurisdiction of the civil court cannot be said to be impliedly barred by the Companies Act for redressal of such a grievance. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:53:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Civil Court Can Address Director Appointment Disputes Due to Lack of Specific Remedy in Companies Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23501</link>
      <description>Appointment of directors - jurisdiction of the civil court - There is no remedy provided under the Companies Act for redressal of such a grievance before any particular court or forum or by recourse to any particular machinery. In these circumstances, the jurisdiction of the civil court cannot be said to be impliedly barred by the Companies Act for redressal of such a grievance. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:53:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>