<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 802 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the applicability of relevant legal precedents and the necessity for a detailed examination of the manufacturing process. The Tribunal held that the claim should be considered despite not being in a revised return, citing a High Court judgment allowing deduction claims made during assessment proceedings. Additionally, the Tribunal referred to a Supreme Court decision on the definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; in the appellant&#039;s context and remitted the issue back to the CIT (Appeals) for further review in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:51:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 802 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the applicability of relevant legal precedents and the necessity for a detailed examination of the manufacturing process. The Tribunal held that the claim should be considered despite not being in a revised return, citing a High Court judgment allowing deduction claims made during assessment proceedings. Additionally, the Tribunal referred to a Supreme Court decision on the definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; in the appellant&#039;s context and remitted the issue back to the CIT (Appeals) for further review in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>