<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding provisions for leave encashment as ascertained liabilities but remanding the issue of gratuity for fresh adjudication based on actuarial valuation. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity in actuarial reports for accurate book profit calculation under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding provisions for leave encashment as ascertained liabilities but remanding the issue of gratuity for fresh adjudication based on actuarial valuation. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity in actuarial reports for accurate book profit calculation under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>