<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 453 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170883</link>
    <description>Central excise appeals were dismissed because counsel agreed the matter was covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier decision in Union of India v. Metal Box Company of India Ltd. The Court therefore applied the controlling precedent and disposed of the civil appeals without costs. The order records no fresh legal determination beyond the binding effect of the prior ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 453 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170883</link>
      <description>Central excise appeals were dismissed because counsel agreed the matter was covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier decision in Union of India v. Metal Box Company of India Ltd. The Court therefore applied the controlling precedent and disposed of the civil appeals without costs. The order records no fresh legal determination beyond the binding effect of the prior ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>