<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Retail Price Marking on Defense-Supplied Shoes Challenged: Institutional Buyers&#039; MRP Presumption Under Scrutiny by Department.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23486</link>
    <description>Whether the retail price was indelibly printed or embarks on the shoes - just because the shoes were supplied to Defence organisation, which according to the Department are institutional buyers it cannot be presumed that no MRP had been printed or embossed on the footwear. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:18:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:18:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Retail Price Marking on Defense-Supplied Shoes Challenged: Institutional Buyers&#039; MRP Presumption Under Scrutiny by Department.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23486</link>
      <description>Whether the retail price was indelibly printed or embarks on the shoes - just because the shoes were supplied to Defence organisation, which according to the Department are institutional buyers it cannot be presumed that no MRP had been printed or embossed on the footwear. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:18:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>