https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260820 Simultaneous availment of Notification Nos. 29/2004-CE and 30/2004-CE was treated as permissible where the goods were nil duty and exported. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that Rule 6(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 did not bar credit in such circumstances because the case fell within the statutory exceptions for nil-rated or exported goods under Rule 6(5) and Rule 6(6). On that basis, the demand based on alleged ineligibility to claim both notifications was held unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal succeeded. en-us Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260820 Simultaneous availment of Notification Nos. 29/2004-CE and 30/2004-CE was treated as permissible where the goods were nil duty and exported. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that Rule 6(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 did not bar credit in such circumstances because the case fell within the statutory exceptions for nil-rated or exported goods under Rule 6(5) and Rule 6(6). On that basis, the demand based on alleged ineligibility to claim both notifications was held unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal succeeded. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260820