<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 743 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260818</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Custom House Agent, setting aside the penalty for lack of evidence of active collusion in smuggling. The appeal of the Container Freight Station was partially allowed, reducing the penalty to Rs. 2.5 lakhs due to failure in custodial responsibilities. The judgment was pronounced on 15.6.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 743 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260818</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Custom House Agent, setting aside the penalty for lack of evidence of active collusion in smuggling. The appeal of the Container Freight Station was partially allowed, reducing the penalty to Rs. 2.5 lakhs due to failure in custodial responsibilities. The judgment was pronounced on 15.6.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>