https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260812 A consequential duty demand could not survive after the foundational adjudication order had already been set aside and remanded. The quantified demand was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted to the original authority for de novo adjudication on merits, including fresh determination of Annual Capacity Production in line with the directions in the connected remand order and after accounting for amounts already paid. en-us Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260812 A consequential duty demand could not survive after the foundational adjudication order had already been set aside and remanded. The quantified demand was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted to the original authority for de novo adjudication on merits, including fresh determination of Annual Capacity Production in line with the directions in the connected remand order and after accounting for amounts already paid. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260812