<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 736 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260811</link>
    <description>Tractor cess was held leviable on tractors cleared during the relevant period because the levy flowed from the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 and the Tractor Cess Rules, 1992, and the applicable schedule specifically covered tractors; the demand was sustained. The penalty imposed under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not maintained on the facts, so the penal consequence was set aside. The result was a partly allowed appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 736 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260811</link>
      <description>Tractor cess was held leviable on tractors cleared during the relevant period because the levy flowed from the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 and the Tractor Cess Rules, 1992, and the applicable schedule specifically covered tractors; the demand was sustained. The penalty imposed under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not maintained on the facts, so the penal consequence was set aside. The result was a partly allowed appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>