https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260808 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant companies, setting aside the denial of duty exemption under Notification No. 5/06-CE (Sl. No. 5). It emphasized the necessity of marking the retail sale price on footwear supplied to Defence organizations to qualify for the exemption, regardless of other regulations. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the denial of exemption and concluded that compliance with the marking condition was mandatory for claiming the duty exemption, ultimately allowing the appeals and rejecting the imposition of penalties. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2015 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260808 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant companies, setting aside the denial of duty exemption under Notification No. 5/06-CE (Sl. No. 5). It emphasized the necessity of marking the retail sale price on footwear supplied to Defence organizations to qualify for the exemption, regardless of other regulations. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the denial of exemption and concluded that compliance with the marking condition was mandatory for claiming the duty exemption, ultimately allowing the appeals and rejecting the imposition of penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260808