<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Yes Bank Nomination Rights Arise from Shareholding Strength, Not a &#039;Contract of Personal Service&#039;.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23468</link>
    <description>Control of Yes Bank - Right to Nominate is not in the nature of a ‘contract of personal service’ and was not limited to the two individuals in question. There is no question of contextual repugnancy - It was unnecessary to include in the Articles a mere ‘right to suggest’; brute strength in shareholding and even mere shareholding would have done as well. It is the right to nominate - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:17:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Yes Bank Nomination Rights Arise from Shareholding Strength, Not a &#039;Contract of Personal Service&#039;.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23468</link>
      <description>Control of Yes Bank - Right to Nominate is not in the nature of a ‘contract of personal service’ and was not limited to the two individuals in question. There is no question of contextual repugnancy - It was unnecessary to include in the Articles a mere ‘right to suggest’; brute strength in shareholding and even mere shareholding would have done as well. It is the right to nominate - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:17:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>