<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1360 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170873</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the appellate authority to decline adjournment and consider the case, noting mis-declaration of the country of origin in the consignment. Despite the petitioner&#039;s absence, a conditional stay order requiring a deposit of Rs. 10 crores was granted. The Court found that the order did not violate principles of natural justice and satisfied the necessary test, dismissing the challenge to the conditional stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:05:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1360 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170873</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the appellate authority to decline adjournment and consider the case, noting mis-declaration of the country of origin in the consignment. Despite the petitioner&#039;s absence, a conditional stay order requiring a deposit of Rs. 10 crores was granted. The Court found that the order did not violate principles of natural justice and satisfied the necessary test, dismissing the challenge to the conditional stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>