https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170867 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case involving alleged oppression through the clandestine issue of shares in a family company. The petitioner, claiming control over 68% shares, alleged that the issue of 10,000 shares to respondents reduced his majority stake to a minority. The court directed the petitioner to assume control of the company upon meeting specified conditions, emphasizing equitable resolution in family company disputes and the importance of fairness and integrity in such matters. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:53:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170867 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case involving alleged oppression through the clandestine issue of shares in a family company. The petitioner, claiming control over 68% shares, alleged that the issue of 10,000 shares to respondents reduced his majority stake to a minority. The court directed the petitioner to assume control of the company upon meeting specified conditions, emphasizing equitable resolution in family company disputes and the importance of fairness and integrity in such matters. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170867