https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260771 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, highlighting the impermissibility of demanding service tax without adjudicating the actual amount owed. Recovery on an assumed basis was deemed arbitrary, emphasizing the need for proper adjudication before making recovery demands. The court granted the petitioner an interim order, staying the recovery proceedings until the next listing date, in line with prescribed procedures under the Finance Act, 1994. This decision aimed to protect the petitioner's rights and ensure fairness in tax recovery processes, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures and due process. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260771 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, highlighting the impermissibility of demanding service tax without adjudicating the actual amount owed. Recovery on an assumed basis was deemed arbitrary, emphasizing the need for proper adjudication before making recovery demands. The court granted the petitioner an interim order, staying the recovery proceedings until the next listing date, in line with prescribed procedures under the Finance Act, 1994. This decision aimed to protect the petitioner's rights and ensure fairness in tax recovery processes, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures and due process. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260771