<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 685 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260760</link>
    <description>Rectification of the register of members may be sought by a person treated as a joint shareholder, and private arrangements such as trust claims do not override the register. Objections based on estoppel, waiver, acquiescence and non-joinder were rejected where statutory transfer requirements remained mandatory. The document also notes that suppression of material facts can defeat equitable relief, and that in the absence of a specific limitation period for rectification, Article 137 applies. On the stated facts, the transfer was treated as invalid because the company could not establish compliance with the prescribed transfer procedure and supporting records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 685 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260760</link>
      <description>Rectification of the register of members may be sought by a person treated as a joint shareholder, and private arrangements such as trust claims do not override the register. Objections based on estoppel, waiver, acquiescence and non-joinder were rejected where statutory transfer requirements remained mandatory. The document also notes that suppression of material facts can defeat equitable relief, and that in the absence of a specific limitation period for rectification, Article 137 applies. On the stated facts, the transfer was treated as invalid because the company could not establish compliance with the prescribed transfer procedure and supporting records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>