<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 676 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the acceptance of the assessee&#039;s books of accounts and deleting the additions made under Sections 145(3) and 69A of the Income Tax Act. However, the challenge to the interest levied under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was dismissed. The judgment underscores the significance of thorough examination of documentary evidence and maintenance of detailed records to support claims in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 676 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the acceptance of the assessee&#039;s books of accounts and deleting the additions made under Sections 145(3) and 69A of the Income Tax Act. However, the challenge to the interest levied under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was dismissed. The judgment underscores the significance of thorough examination of documentary evidence and maintenance of detailed records to support claims in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>