<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment, despite specific requests by the assessee. Consequently, the reassessment orders for the relevant years were quashed, and all appeals by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of communicating reasons for reopening assessments to prevent arbitrary actions and ensure compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:29:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment, despite specific requests by the assessee. Consequently, the reassessment orders for the relevant years were quashed, and all appeals by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of communicating reasons for reopening assessments to prevent arbitrary actions and ensure compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>