<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 652 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260727</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of two individuals, reducing penalties imposed on the companies from Rs. 15 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs each. While the appellants were not directly involved in smuggling Red Sanders, their failure to comply with KYC norms rendered them liable for penalties under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal recognized the appellants&#039; limited role and the specific circumstances, leading to a reduction in penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 652 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260727</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of two individuals, reducing penalties imposed on the companies from Rs. 15 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs each. While the appellants were not directly involved in smuggling Red Sanders, their failure to comply with KYC norms rendered them liable for penalties under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal recognized the appellants&#039; limited role and the specific circumstances, leading to a reduction in penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>