<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 630 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260705</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, loss on unutilised stamp papers for proposed land transactions was not deductible in the year under appeal because the expenditure had neither arisen nor crystallised in that year; the bad-debt framework was held inapplicable, and the disallowance was sustained. However, where part of the related claim was said to have been received in a later year and taxed there, the matter was remitted for verification of books and assessment records so any duplicate taxation could be reduced to that limited extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:25:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 630 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260705</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, loss on unutilised stamp papers for proposed land transactions was not deductible in the year under appeal because the expenditure had neither arisen nor crystallised in that year; the bad-debt framework was held inapplicable, and the disallowance was sustained. However, where part of the related claim was said to have been received in a later year and taxed there, the matter was remitted for verification of books and assessment records so any duplicate taxation could be reduced to that limited extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>