<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 531 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170856</link>
    <description>Duty could not be sustained on a ground not stated in the show cause notice, because the levy was ultimately based on clearances exceeding the monetary limit while the notice proceeded on a different footing. The dispute over the exemption notification was left open for consideration by the Larger Bench. The challenge to the demand was stated to have failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:58:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 531 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170856</link>
      <description>Duty could not be sustained on a ground not stated in the show cause notice, because the levy was ultimately based on clearances exceeding the monetary limit while the notice proceeded on a different footing. The dispute over the exemption notification was left open for consideration by the Larger Bench. The challenge to the demand was stated to have failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>