<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1280 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170850</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed because the appellants failed to file the paper book despite the matters being pending since 1995, and counsel stated that the appeals could not be argued without it. The court did not decide the central excise issues on merits and disposed of the matters solely for non-compliance with the paper book requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:27:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1280 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170850</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed because the appellants failed to file the paper book despite the matters being pending since 1995, and counsel stated that the appeals could not be argued without it. The court did not decide the central excise issues on merits and disposed of the matters solely for non-compliance with the paper book requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>