https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170842 Section 191 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 did not apply where cognizance was taken on a complaint of facts constituting the offence under Section 190(1)(a), so the Magistrate's omission to inform the accused of a right to be tried by another court did not vitiate the proceedings. Irregularities in reading over and interpreting depositions were also held curable, because the record showed the evidence was read over, no objection or missed correction was demonstrated, and no prejudice or failure of justice was shown. Curative provisions therefore applied, and the conviction was upheld. en-us Tue, 14 Dec 1926 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jun 2015 10:42:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170842 Section 191 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 did not apply where cognizance was taken on a complaint of facts constituting the offence under Section 190(1)(a), so the Magistrate's omission to inform the accused of a right to be tried by another court did not vitiate the proceedings. Irregularities in reading over and interpreting depositions were also held curable, because the record showed the evidence was read over, no objection or missed correction was demonstrated, and no prejudice or failure of justice was shown. Curative provisions therefore applied, and the conviction was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Dec 1926 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170842