<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 625 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260700</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services under banking and financial services. The core issue was whether the appellant&#039;s activities, related to collecting octroi on behalf of municipal bodies, qualified as banking and financial services. The tribunal found that the appellant did not meet the criteria to be classified as a financial institution and that their services did not align with the comprehensive scope of cash management as defined. As a result, the tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals and setting aside the order in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 625 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260700</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services under banking and financial services. The core issue was whether the appellant&#039;s activities, related to collecting octroi on behalf of municipal bodies, qualified as banking and financial services. The tribunal found that the appellant did not meet the criteria to be classified as a financial institution and that their services did not align with the comprehensive scope of cash management as defined. As a result, the tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals and setting aside the order in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>