<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 608 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260683</link>
    <description>Additions based on seized papers found from a third party and a third party&#039;s statement were held unsustainable where no incriminating material was found from the assessee&#039;s premises, the assessee denied receipt, and cross-examination was not allowed. The Tribunal held that the search presumption applies against the person from whom the documents were seized, not automatically against another person, and that uncorroborated third-party material was insufficient to prove undisclosed income in the assessee&#039;s hands. Reliance on deemed taxation under section 56(2)(vi) also failed because receipt itself was not established. The additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=388019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 608 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260683</link>
      <description>Additions based on seized papers found from a third party and a third party&#039;s statement were held unsustainable where no incriminating material was found from the assessee&#039;s premises, the assessee denied receipt, and cross-examination was not allowed. The Tribunal held that the search presumption applies against the person from whom the documents were seized, not automatically against another person, and that uncorroborated third-party material was insufficient to prove undisclosed income in the assessee&#039;s hands. Reliance on deemed taxation under section 56(2)(vi) also failed because receipt itself was not established. The additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>