<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CENVAT Credit Valid for Appellant Despite Invoice Address Discrepancy, Supported by Rule 9(i)(e); Stay Granted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23403</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - Since the, challans under which the service tax, in question, has been paid and on the basis of which CENVAT Credit has been taken mention the Gurgaon Unit as the assessee, in terms of Rule 9 (i) (e), the CENVAT Credit cannot be denied to the appellant even though the invoices mention the address of Bangalore Unit of the Appellant Company - stay granted - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:18:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CENVAT Credit Valid for Appellant Despite Invoice Address Discrepancy, Supported by Rule 9(i)(e); Stay Granted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23403</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - Since the, challans under which the service tax, in question, has been paid and on the basis of which CENVAT Credit has been taken mention the Gurgaon Unit as the assessee, in terms of Rule 9 (i) (e), the CENVAT Credit cannot be denied to the appellant even though the invoices mention the address of Bangalore Unit of the Appellant Company - stay granted - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:18:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>