https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170840 Requisitioning of immovable property for public purposes was treated as acquisition in substance because it deprives the owner of possession under the State's eminent domain power, so compensation disputes under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act fell within Section 51 of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act. The statutory arbitrator's binding award under Section 8 was also held to be an "order" relating to compensation in that statutory context, even though the term may ordinarily draw meaning from the Code of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, court fee on the appeal was held payable ad valorem, and the residuary schedule entry was inapplicable. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170840 Requisitioning of immovable property for public purposes was treated as acquisition in substance because it deprives the owner of possession under the State's eminent domain power, so compensation disputes under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act fell within Section 51 of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act. The statutory arbitrator's binding award under Section 8 was also held to be an "order" relating to compensation in that statutory context, even though the term may ordinarily draw meaning from the Code of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, court fee on the appeal was held payable ad valorem, and the residuary schedule entry was inapplicable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170840