<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 584 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260659</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the demand for wrongly utilized CENVAT Credit for service tax liability on renting immovable property. The Tribunal emphasized the requirement of nexus between input and output services for credit utilization, disallowing the credit use for service tax on renting immovable property due to the lack of nexus. The Tribunal upheld the demand for wrongly utilized credit and allowed re-crediting of the amount already paid, waiving the penalty under Section 80.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 584 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260659</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the demand for wrongly utilized CENVAT Credit for service tax liability on renting immovable property. The Tribunal emphasized the requirement of nexus between input and output services for credit utilization, disallowing the credit use for service tax on renting immovable property due to the lack of nexus. The Tribunal upheld the demand for wrongly utilized credit and allowed re-crediting of the amount already paid, waiving the penalty under Section 80.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>