https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260656 The Tribunal granted the appellant's stay application, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying the recovery process. The decision was based on the view that CENVAT Credit should not be denied, considering the payment details and application of relevant rules. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order incorrect, emphasizing the clear payment of service tax by the Gurgaon Unit for services received from the parent company in France, and validated the CENVAT Credit claim under Rule 9(1)(e) due to the challans specifying the Gurgaon Unit as the assessee. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260656 The Tribunal granted the appellant's stay application, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying the recovery process. The decision was based on the view that CENVAT Credit should not be denied, considering the payment details and application of relevant rules. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order incorrect, emphasizing the clear payment of service tax by the Gurgaon Unit for services received from the parent company in France, and validated the CENVAT Credit claim under Rule 9(1)(e) due to the challans specifying the Gurgaon Unit as the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260656