<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 577 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260652</link>
    <description>The High Court substituted the Tribunal&#039;s direction regarding the attachment of the appellant&#039;s assets for recovery purposes. The Court directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to expedite the appeal&#039;s disposal within three months, ensuring fairness and justice in the process. The Court clarified that its order did not express any opinion on the merits of the controversy, keeping all contentions open for both sides and ensuring the appellant&#039;s opportunity to meet the Revenue&#039;s case was not denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 577 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260652</link>
      <description>The High Court substituted the Tribunal&#039;s direction regarding the attachment of the appellant&#039;s assets for recovery purposes. The Court directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to expedite the appeal&#039;s disposal within three months, ensuring fairness and justice in the process. The Court clarified that its order did not express any opinion on the merits of the controversy, keeping all contentions open for both sides and ensuring the appellant&#039;s opportunity to meet the Revenue&#039;s case was not denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>