<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 575 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260650</link>
    <description>In SVB-related customs matters, appeals against assessment orders passed at Nhava Sheva lie before the jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals), Nhava Sheva, under the customs administrative scheme and Board circular governing review and appeals. Where the underlying valuation dispute originating from Delhi SVB proceedings remains pending in de novo adjudication, related matters may be kept pending and remanded to the original adjudicating authority to avoid conflicting outcomes and multiplicity of litigation, after the Delhi case is decided. The instructions also support dispensing with 1% extra duty deposit in the stated circumstances, with a PD bond treated as sufficient pending final determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 06:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 575 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260650</link>
      <description>In SVB-related customs matters, appeals against assessment orders passed at Nhava Sheva lie before the jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals), Nhava Sheva, under the customs administrative scheme and Board circular governing review and appeals. Where the underlying valuation dispute originating from Delhi SVB proceedings remains pending in de novo adjudication, related matters may be kept pending and remanded to the original adjudicating authority to avoid conflicting outcomes and multiplicity of litigation, after the Delhi case is decided. The instructions also support dispensing with 1% extra duty deposit in the stated circumstances, with a PD bond treated as sufficient pending final determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>