<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260648</link>
    <description>Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) remains available to a co-operative society providing credit facilities to its members unless it satisfies all cumulative conditions of a co-operative bank under Section 80P(4) read with the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The exclusion applies only where banking is the principal business and the bye-laws prohibit admission of another co-operative society as a member. On the stated facts, banking was not shown to be the principal business and the bye-laws lacked the required prohibition, so the entity was treated as a co-operative credit society. Limited dealings with non-members did not change that character, though income from non-member transactions was not covered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260648</link>
      <description>Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) remains available to a co-operative society providing credit facilities to its members unless it satisfies all cumulative conditions of a co-operative bank under Section 80P(4) read with the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The exclusion applies only where banking is the principal business and the bye-laws prohibit admission of another co-operative society as a member. On the stated facts, banking was not shown to be the principal business and the bye-laws lacked the required prohibition, so the entity was treated as a co-operative credit society. Limited dealings with non-members did not change that character, though income from non-member transactions was not covered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>