<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 560 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of brokerage as a deduction from rental income, emphasizing the limited scope of allowable deductions under the Income Tax Act. The decision clarified the distinction between expenses related to property enjoyment and external expenses like brokerage, setting a precedent for similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 560 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of brokerage as a deduction from rental income, emphasizing the limited scope of allowable deductions under the Income Tax Act. The decision clarified the distinction between expenses related to property enjoyment and external expenses like brokerage, setting a precedent for similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>