<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 556 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the process of heat treatment with steam on green slats to create pencil slats and seasoned timber amounted to manufacturing. It found that the processes transformed the green slats into a new product with distinct properties suitable for pencil manufacturing, differentiating the case from prior Supreme Court precedent. The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision, ruling against the appellants and rejecting their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 556 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the process of heat treatment with steam on green slats to create pencil slats and seasoned timber amounted to manufacturing. It found that the processes transformed the green slats into a new product with distinct properties suitable for pencil manufacturing, differentiating the case from prior Supreme Court precedent. The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision, ruling against the appellants and rejecting their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>