https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170817 A review petition before the SC was found misconceived because no substantive ground for review was shown to justify interference with the earlier order. The Court held that the petition did not meet the threshold for review and, on that basis, rejected it. The result was dismissal of the review petition as misconceived. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:38:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170817 A review petition before the SC was found misconceived because no substantive ground for review was shown to justify interference with the earlier order. The Court held that the petition did not meet the threshold for review and, on that basis, rejected it. The result was dismissal of the review petition as misconceived. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170817