<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 548 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260623</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was contested for foreign agency commission paid to nonresident agents. ITAT found no permanent establishment or Indiabased agreement, no evidence of technical services, and no proof payments accrued, arose or were paid in India; therefore the payments were not taxable in India and no TDS deduction was required. The tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance and decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 548 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260623</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was contested for foreign agency commission paid to nonresident agents. ITAT found no permanent establishment or Indiabased agreement, no evidence of technical services, and no proof payments accrued, arose or were paid in India; therefore the payments were not taxable in India and no TDS deduction was required. The tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance and decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>