<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260620</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of both appellants on merits, leading to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals on the issue of penalties. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the various legal and factual aspects surrounding the classification, valuation, revenue neutrality, and time limitation issues in the context of the service tax demand on container relocation activities between the two terminals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260620</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of both appellants on merits, leading to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals on the issue of penalties. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the various legal and factual aspects surrounding the classification, valuation, revenue neutrality, and time limitation issues in the context of the service tax demand on container relocation activities between the two terminals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>