https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260615 The Tribunal held that the duty demand of Rs. 32,25,805 for March 2011 and Rs. 1,51,35,483 for July 2013 against the appellant, a manufacturer of Gutkha, Pan Masala, and Chewing Tobacco, was unsustainable. The duty payment for the entire month was not mandatory, and duty for new machines in July 2013 should be prorated based on the days operated. The Commissioner's duty demand of Rs. 1,83,61,288 and penalties were waived pending appeal, with a stay granted for a final hearing. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260615 The Tribunal held that the duty demand of Rs. 32,25,805 for March 2011 and Rs. 1,51,35,483 for July 2013 against the appellant, a manufacturer of Gutkha, Pan Masala, and Chewing Tobacco, was unsustainable. The duty payment for the entire month was not mandatory, and duty for new machines in July 2013 should be prorated based on the days operated. The Commissioner's duty demand of Rs. 1,83,61,288 and penalties were waived pending appeal, with a stay granted for a final hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260615