https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260613 An earlier appellate decision had already settled the central excise valuation dispute, leaving only a limited remand to verify whether the cost of the pancake master tape had been amortised over the cassettes manufactured. The Tribunal found that the de novo authority had already taken that factor into account and that no further re-working of duty was required. As the limited remand direction stood complied with and the assessee had not reopened the merits determination, no fresh grievance survived. The confirmation of duty, penalty and interest was therefore sustained and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:57:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260613 An earlier appellate decision had already settled the central excise valuation dispute, leaving only a limited remand to verify whether the cost of the pancake master tape had been amortised over the cassettes manufactured. The Tribunal found that the de novo authority had already taken that factor into account and that no further re-working of duty was required. As the limited remand direction stood complied with and the assessee had not reopened the merits determination, no fresh grievance survived. The confirmation of duty, penalty and interest was therefore sustained and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260613