<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 537 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260612</link>
    <description>Refund of differential duty under a concessional levy for motor spirit used in ethanol blending cannot be denied solely for procedural non-compliance where eligibility has attained finality and registration was obtained shortly after the first consignment. The refund claim must be examined on its merits rather than rejected only for the alleged lapse. Unjust enrichment does not bar refund where the price remained unchanged and the duty incidence was not passed on. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the refund claim was sustained with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 537 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260612</link>
      <description>Refund of differential duty under a concessional levy for motor spirit used in ethanol blending cannot be denied solely for procedural non-compliance where eligibility has attained finality and registration was obtained shortly after the first consignment. The refund claim must be examined on its merits rather than rejected only for the alleged lapse. Unjust enrichment does not bar refund where the price remained unchanged and the duty incidence was not passed on. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the refund claim was sustained with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>