<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 529 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for setting off Long Term Capital Loss on shares against Long Term Capital Gain on land, overruling the AO and CIT(A). It remanded the Section 14A disallowance back to the AO for re-examination, as the AO failed to verify the assessee&#039;s claim. Consequently, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 529 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for setting off Long Term Capital Loss on shares against Long Term Capital Gain on land, overruling the AO and CIT(A). It remanded the Section 14A disallowance back to the AO for re-examination, as the AO failed to verify the assessee&#039;s claim. Consequently, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>