<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 525 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 15,45,89,893 to the total income of a microfinance institution, ruling that the entire gain from the assignment of the loan portfolio should be taxed in the year of receipt. The Tribunal also remitted the issue of deduction under section 35D back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, while dismissing general grounds and unpressed grounds. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 525 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 15,45,89,893 to the total income of a microfinance institution, ruling that the entire gain from the assignment of the loan portfolio should be taxed in the year of receipt. The Tribunal also remitted the issue of deduction under section 35D back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, while dismissing general grounds and unpressed grounds. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>