<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Legal Precedents Bind Specific Issues, Not Logical Deductions; Distinction Between Dicta and Obiter Dicta Crucial.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23362</link>
    <description>A decision, it is well settled, is an authority for what it decides and not what can logically be deduced therefrom. The distinction between a dicta and obiter is well known. Obiter dicta is more or less presumably unnecessary to the decision. It may be an expression of a viewpoint or sentiments which has no binding effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:58:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:58:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Precedents Bind Specific Issues, Not Logical Deductions; Distinction Between Dicta and Obiter Dicta Crucial.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23362</link>
      <description>A decision, it is well settled, is an authority for what it decides and not what can logically be deduced therefrom. The distinction between a dicta and obiter is well known. Obiter dicta is more or less presumably unnecessary to the decision. It may be an expression of a viewpoint or sentiments which has no binding effect.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:58:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>