<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 728 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170809</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the assessee, acting as agent of the non-resident company, was not obligated to deduct tax at source. It dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department, stating that no reasonable cause existed for charging interest under Section 201(1A) of the I.T. Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 728 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170809</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the assessee, acting as agent of the non-resident company, was not obligated to deduct tax at source. It dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department, stating that no reasonable cause existed for charging interest under Section 201(1A) of the I.T. Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>