<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 637 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170807</link>
    <description>Central Excise dispute in Commissioner v. Woodmen Industries reached the Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal by order. The text does not state the reasoning or any substantive legal principle applied, so no further outcome-based analysis can be drawn from the provided material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 637 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170807</link>
      <description>Central Excise dispute in Commissioner v. Woodmen Industries reached the Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal by order. The text does not state the reasoning or any substantive legal principle applied, so no further outcome-based analysis can be drawn from the provided material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>