<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PRESENTING OFFICER MAY BE A WITNESS IN A DOMESTIC INQUIRY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6312</link>
    <description>The Larger Bench held that mere participation of the Presenting Officer as a witness does not automatically vitiate a domestic inquiry; the delinquent must be permitted to cross examine that witness and must prove real prejudice affecting substantial legal rights for the inquiry to be set aside, with the burden of proof on the employee, while the Inquiry Officer must ensure fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:20:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=387749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PRESENTING OFFICER MAY BE A WITNESS IN A DOMESTIC INQUIRY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6312</link>
      <description>The Larger Bench held that mere participation of the Presenting Officer as a witness does not automatically vitiate a domestic inquiry; the delinquent must be permitted to cross examine that witness and must prove real prejudice affecting substantial legal rights for the inquiry to be set aside, with the burden of proof on the employee, while the Inquiry Officer must ensure fairness.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:20:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>