https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260577 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to dismiss the appeal due to untimely filing under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Citing the Supreme Court precedent in Singh Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines without condonation. The appeal and stay petition were both dismissed, underscoring the significance of complying with prescribed periods for filing appeals in excise cases. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:17:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260577 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to dismiss the appeal due to untimely filing under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Citing the Supreme Court precedent in Singh Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines without condonation. The appeal and stay petition were both dismissed, underscoring the significance of complying with prescribed periods for filing appeals in excise cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260577